<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review &#8211; Fantastic Mr. Fox (2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentarytrack.com/2009/11/21/review-fantastic-mr-fox-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2009/11/21/review-fantastic-mr-fox-2009/</link>
	<description>movie reviews, news and discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:07:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Fox</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2009/11/21/review-fantastic-mr-fox-2009/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/?p=6069#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>this movie rocks! You guys dont know what the cuss your talking about!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this movie rocks! You guys dont know what the cuss your talking about!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2009/11/21/review-fantastic-mr-fox-2009/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/?p=6069#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>I just saw it today.  An extremely entertaining and uplifting film.  However, it does not aim for emotional heftiness (I don&#039;t feel like this is what it was trying to go for in the first place).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw it today.  An extremely entertaining and uplifting film.  However, it does not aim for emotional heftiness (I don&#8217;t feel like this is what it was trying to go for in the first place).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nir Shalev</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2009/11/21/review-fantastic-mr-fox-2009/#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Nir Shalev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/?p=6069#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>Hey, look at anime.  At least 70% of it the shows and movies are for adults and most of most of them are OVAs (Original Video Animation, which means they went straight to video).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, look at anime.  At least 70% of it the shows and movies are for adults and most of most of them are OVAs (Original Video Animation, which means they went straight to video).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2009/11/21/review-fantastic-mr-fox-2009/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/?p=6069#comment-1041</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with the majority on this one; it&#039;s a very entertaining film. I don&#039;t see it as a family film at all, outside of the persistent American equating of animation with children. It was very amusing and Clooney&#039;s voice work was excellent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with the majority on this one; it&#8217;s a very entertaining film. I don&#8217;t see it as a family film at all, outside of the persistent American equating of animation with children. It was very amusing and Clooney&#8217;s voice work was excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nir Shalev</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2009/11/21/review-fantastic-mr-fox-2009/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>Nir Shalev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/?p=6069#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>lol
Gotcha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol<br />
Gotcha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2009/11/21/review-fantastic-mr-fox-2009/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/?p=6069#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>hmm, in this case my 2.5 equates to something like &#039;recommended to anderson fans only&#039;, so that depends on you. i don&#039;t mean to complain that it&#039;s too wes anderson and not enough dahl; more that every anderson film would be &#039;too wes anderson&#039; for my liking without the melancholy underlying the quirks. this one seems to be mostly a stylistic experiment with substance coming as an afterthought, but for some anderson lovers i&#039;m sure the style is enough by itself. i found myself admiring the craft in places but there was no magic there for me.

btw, i&#039;m a brit and i hate cider, at least these days :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, in this case my 2.5 equates to something like &#8216;recommended to anderson fans only&#8217;, so that depends on you. i don&#8217;t mean to complain that it&#8217;s too wes anderson and not enough dahl; more that every anderson film would be &#8216;too wes anderson&#8217; for my liking without the melancholy underlying the quirks. this one seems to be mostly a stylistic experiment with substance coming as an afterthought, but for some anderson lovers i&#8217;m sure the style is enough by itself. i found myself admiring the craft in places but there was no magic there for me.</p>
<p>btw, i&#8217;m a brit and i hate cider, at least these days :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nir Shalev</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2009/11/21/review-fantastic-mr-fox-2009/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>Nir Shalev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/?p=6069#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>Sorry, about the Tom mixup.
So Tom, rental?  0_&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, about the Tom mixup.<br />
So Tom, rental?  0_&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2009/11/21/review-fantastic-mr-fox-2009/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/?p=6069#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>The three farmers give the movie its charm and focus.  Simultaneously greedy, protective, bumbling, and aggressive, they make you want to see their products find new homes.  Warning to American viewers: the Brits drink hard cider the way we drink Old Milwaukee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The three farmers give the movie its charm and focus.  Simultaneously greedy, protective, bumbling, and aggressive, they make you want to see their products find new homes.  Warning to American viewers: the Brits drink hard cider the way we drink Old Milwaukee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2009/11/21/review-fantastic-mr-fox-2009/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/?p=6069#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll have to ask Tom, it&#039;s his rating. ;) Personally I am still really looking forward to seeing it and planning to do so today, but that&#039;s because of Anderson&#039;s track record (I adore The Royal Tenenbaums and really like The Life Aquatic).

Besides, how can it be Ocean&#039;s 11 without Brad Pitt?! ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll have to ask Tom, it&#8217;s his rating. ;) Personally I am still really looking forward to seeing it and planning to do so today, but that&#8217;s because of Anderson&#8217;s track record (I adore The Royal Tenenbaums and really like The Life Aquatic).</p>
<p>Besides, how can it be Ocean&#8217;s 11 without Brad Pitt?! ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nir Shalev</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2009/11/21/review-fantastic-mr-fox-2009/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Nir Shalev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/?p=6069#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s strange how some people call THIS film &quot;amazing&quot; and others feel that it&#039;s too Wes Anderson and too little Dahl and therefore, say skip it.  I am just amazed as to how this film could have possibly become amazing in the first place.  It&#039;s Ocean&#039;s 11 with foxes and that Anderson touch.  And I don&#039;t even like the half-assed stop-motion jerkiness of it.

Helen, does 2 1/2 stars means rent it or skip it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s strange how some people call THIS film &#8220;amazing&#8221; and others feel that it&#8217;s too Wes Anderson and too little Dahl and therefore, say skip it.  I am just amazed as to how this film could have possibly become amazing in the first place.  It&#8217;s Ocean&#8217;s 11 with foxes and that Anderson touch.  And I don&#8217;t even like the half-assed stop-motion jerkiness of it.</p>
<p>Helen, does 2 1/2 stars means rent it or skip it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

