<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review &#8211; Wanted (2008)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentarytrack.com/2008/07/02/review-wanted-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2008/07/02/review-wanted-2008/</link>
	<description>movie reviews, news and discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 05:18:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2008/07/02/review-wanted-2008/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.wordpress.com/?p=748#comment-490</guid>
		<description>I personally disliked the fact the film was basically a rip off Fight Club.

That, and the ending in which the killers give in to fate instead of creating it for themselves somewhat angered me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally disliked the fact the film was basically a rip off Fight Club.</p>
<p>That, and the ending in which the killers give in to fate instead of creating it for themselves somewhat angered me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2008/07/02/review-wanted-2008/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.wordpress.com/?p=748#comment-489</guid>
		<description>While I&#039;m not sure that the review or any of the comments are wrong, I actually enjoyed the film.  This is a testament to the power of low expectations and to a fine performance by McAvoy, who often seems to be inhabiting his own personal film while absurdity resides all around him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I&#8217;m not sure that the review or any of the comments are wrong, I actually enjoyed the film.  This is a testament to the power of low expectations and to a fine performance by McAvoy, who often seems to be inhabiting his own personal film while absurdity resides all around him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2008/07/02/review-wanted-2008/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.wordpress.com/?p=748#comment-488</guid>
		<description>A basically unpleasant and unenjoyable film. However, I would add a half star to your rating, for the following reasons. While it was one of the primary reasons the film was so unpleasant, I must admit the depiction of the Fraternity assassins as vicious, despicable, amoral psychopaths struck an unexpected note of psychological credibility. Although a gullible fool and frequently obnoxious, Wesley was a little bit likeable by the end; I credit McAvoy entirely for that. I enjoyed the direction, particularly in the action scenes and most particularly in the climactic sequence. The visual stylings are certainly not enough to redeem this mess of a film, but they are at least one of the few pleasurable aspects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A basically unpleasant and unenjoyable film. However, I would add a half star to your rating, for the following reasons. While it was one of the primary reasons the film was so unpleasant, I must admit the depiction of the Fraternity assassins as vicious, despicable, amoral psychopaths struck an unexpected note of psychological credibility. Although a gullible fool and frequently obnoxious, Wesley was a little bit likeable by the end; I credit McAvoy entirely for that. I enjoyed the direction, particularly in the action scenes and most particularly in the climactic sequence. The visual stylings are certainly not enough to redeem this mess of a film, but they are at least one of the few pleasurable aspects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2008/07/02/review-wanted-2008/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.wordpress.com/?p=748#comment-487</guid>
		<description>Yeah, sounds about right. I&#039;m not sure if anyone was expecting much more than this, but I certainly wasn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, sounds about right. I&#8217;m not sure if anyone was expecting much more than this, but I certainly wasn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miriam</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2008/07/02/review-wanted-2008/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>miriam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.wordpress.com/?p=748#comment-486</guid>
		<description>I was tired of this one by the end of the trailer.  Yet this frenetic drivel will play everywhere and Sayle&#039;s &#039;Honeydripper&#039;, to mention only one recent example, can&#039;t get decent distribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was tired of this one by the end of the trailer.  Yet this frenetic drivel will play everywhere and Sayle&#8217;s &#8216;Honeydripper&#8217;, to mention only one recent example, can&#8217;t get decent distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

