<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review &#8211; One Hour Photo (2002)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentarytrack.com/2008/05/03/review-one-hour-photo-2002/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2008/05/03/review-one-hour-photo-2002/</link>
	<description>movie reviews, news and discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:07:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomasbalkcom</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2008/05/03/review-one-hour-photo-2002/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>thomasbalkcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.wordpress.com/?p=684#comment-432</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with your opinion about this film being a renter. It truly has little to no re-watch value. I was not happy with the explanation towards the end, it could&#039;ve been left out or executed differently, but what can you do? Nonetheless, extremely well written review</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with your opinion about this film being a renter. It truly has little to no re-watch value. I was not happy with the explanation towards the end, it could&#8217;ve been left out or executed differently, but what can you do? Nonetheless, extremely well written review</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

