<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review &#8211; Spider-Man 3 (2007)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/05/review-spider-man-3-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/05/review-spider-man-3-2007/</link>
	<description>movie reviews, news and discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 05:18:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/05/review-spider-man-3-2007/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Faulkner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 10:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/05/review-spider-man-3-2007/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>I thought the film was on par with the first. It&#039;s the accumulation of bigger, better, more that tends to stick with franchises. Yes the plot was way too much, but that&#039;s because they felt it would be the end of the franchise. With the cash it is making, it is not likely. My thoughts were just to separate the story lines of Venom and Sandman. Sandman first, then deal with Venom on it&#039;s own. It&#039;s what I actually expected going in. I didn&#039;t mind the &quot;dance&quot; sequence, simply because number 2 got that silly in the middle. I also didn&#039;t mind seeing the continuation of a Spiderman story with past characters carrying on. It was not a boring movie to me. The action beats were worth the price of admission. It wasn&#039;t as good as 2, but it was solid enough for me even with the duo villain tag team at the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the film was on par with the first. It&#8217;s the accumulation of bigger, better, more that tends to stick with franchises. Yes the plot was way too much, but that&#8217;s because they felt it would be the end of the franchise. With the cash it is making, it is not likely. My thoughts were just to separate the story lines of Venom and Sandman. Sandman first, then deal with Venom on it&#8217;s own. It&#8217;s what I actually expected going in. I didn&#8217;t mind the &#8220;dance&#8221; sequence, simply because number 2 got that silly in the middle. I also didn&#8217;t mind seeing the continuation of a Spiderman story with past characters carrying on. It was not a boring movie to me. The action beats were worth the price of admission. It wasn&#8217;t as good as 2, but it was solid enough for me even with the duo villain tag team at the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/05/review-spider-man-3-2007/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 16:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/05/review-spider-man-3-2007/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Agreed on all counts... I think the movie did refer to the Sandman as &quot;the Sandman&quot; one time, via a news cast. I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed on all counts&#8230; I think the movie did refer to the Sandman as &#8220;the Sandman&#8221; one time, via a news cast. I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

