<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review &#8211; Fracture (2007)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/03/review-fracture-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/03/review-fracture-2007/</link>
	<description>movie reviews, news and discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:41:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fracture &#171; Everything that&#8217;s happening now.</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/03/review-fracture-2007/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Fracture &#171; Everything that&#8217;s happening now.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/03/review-fracture-2007/#comment-219</guid>
		<description>[...] Rishi Agrawal, a reviewer, agreed that the film does keep the viewer engaged. &#8220;There are plenty of plot twists and [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rishi Agrawal, a reviewer, agreed that the film does keep the viewer engaged. &#8220;There are plenty of plot twists and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Payne</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/03/review-fracture-2007/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 04:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/03/review-fracture-2007/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Egregious!  Good word in discribing this far-fetched plot. A strong unbelievability factor lurking behind every plot twist.

--Jack Payne
  www.sixhrs.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Egregious!  Good word in discribing this far-fetched plot. A strong unbelievability factor lurking behind every plot twist.</p>
<p>&#8211;Jack Payne<br />
  <a href="http://www.sixhrs.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sixhrs.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/03/review-fracture-2007/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/03/review-fracture-2007/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Im kind of deaf and lost a lot of the content in the consistent off camera mumbling. Would you summerize the twists and turns in a short paragraph....Im interested

Thanks

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im kind of deaf and lost a lot of the content in the consistent off camera mumbling. Would you summerize the twists and turns in a short paragraph&#8230;.Im interested</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/03/review-fracture-2007/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 17:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/03/review-fracture-2007/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Fracture is a prime example of why I don&#039;t watch movies or TV shows about lawyers. The plot is so completely preposterous! He&#039;ll lose his new job if he loses the case? He didn&#039;t get a ballistics report on the weapon?? He finds out the arresting detective is the wife&#039;s lover when the detective is questioned on the stand by the defendant??? And all of that was in the trailer! A thriller has to be at least superficially plausible to be suspenseful. Fracture fails the plausibility test to a particularly egregious degree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fracture is a prime example of why I don&#8217;t watch movies or TV shows about lawyers. The plot is so completely preposterous! He&#8217;ll lose his new job if he loses the case? He didn&#8217;t get a ballistics report on the weapon?? He finds out the arresting detective is the wife&#8217;s lover when the detective is questioned on the stand by the defendant??? And all of that was in the trailer! A thriller has to be at least superficially plausible to be suspenseful. Fracture fails the plausibility test to a particularly egregious degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura</title>
		<link>http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/03/review-fracture-2007/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 12:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commentarytrack.com/2007/05/03/review-fracture-2007/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Ok-
I just have to say- AS someone who gets a feel from the trailers usually- Your description and review are exactly what I pictured from this movie.
UGH 
IT is so hard being right</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok-<br />
I just have to say- AS someone who gets a feel from the trailers usually- Your description and review are exactly what I pictured from this movie.<br />
UGH<br />
IT is so hard being right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

